<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perry: Juggling transparency with privacy</title>
	<link>http://www.mspress.org/inkblots/2008/07/03/perry-juggling-transparency-with-privacy/</link>
	<description>Here and there on this and that newspaper</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  2 Dec 2008 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.mspress.org/inkblots/2008/07/03/perry-juggling-transparency-with-privacy/#comment-25054</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mspress.org/inkblots/2008/07/03/perry-juggling-transparency-with-privacy/#comment-25054</guid>
					<description>Update on this column.  The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that employees have a presumption of privacy with text messages and e-mails even while using company accounts in the private sector, &quot;although company policies that spell out the authority to read those e-mails would eliminate the expectation of privacy&quot;. The case is Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co. Inc., No. 07-55282. This article in the National Law Review by Pamela A. MacLean tells about it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/PubArticleFriendlyLT.jsp?id=1202422619785&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Workers' text messages are private&lt;/a&gt;. The ruling uses the Stored Communications Act I mentioned in the column.  Again, this is private sector and not public sector government communications, but it could indicate the judiciary's thoughts on this matter in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update on this column.  The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that employees have a presumption of privacy with text messages and e-mails even while using company accounts in the private sector, &#8220;although company policies that spell out the authority to read those e-mails would eliminate the expectation of privacy&#8221;. The case is Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co. Inc., No. 07-55282. This article in the National Law Review by Pamela A. MacLean tells about it: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/PubArticleFriendlyLT.jsp?id=1202422619785" rel="nofollow"> Workers&#8217; text messages are private</a>. The ruling uses the Stored Communications Act I mentioned in the column.  Again, this is private sector and not public sector government communications, but it could indicate the judiciary&#8217;s thoughts on this matter in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
